• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

fundsforNGOs - United States

Grants and Resources for Sustainability

  • Subscribe for Free
  • Premium Support
  • Premium Sign up
  • Premium Sign in
  • Latest News
  • Funds for US Organizations
    • Nonprofits
    • Community Foundations
    • Faith-based Organizations
    • Tribal Organizations
    • Institutions
      • Hospitals
      • Schools
      • Universities
  • Funds for US Businesses
    • Startups
    • Small Businesses
    • Large Business
  • Funds for US Individuals
    • Artists
    • College Students
    • School Students
    • Entrepreneurs
    • Persons with Disabilities
    • Researchers
    • Veterans
    • House Owners
    • Tenants
  • US Thematic Areas
    • US States
  • Contact
    • About us
    • Submit Your Grant
You are here: Home / News / San Francisco Nonprofit Scandals: Collective Impact Loses Major Contracts Amid Controversy

San Francisco Nonprofit Scandals: Collective Impact Loses Major Contracts Amid Controversy

Dated: December 11, 2024

San Francisco city officials have severed ties with Collective Impact, a nonprofit organization that has been embroiled in a scandal involving conflicts of interest and financial mismanagement. This decision follows an investigation revealing that the nonprofit’s executive director had close personal ties with a former city official, leading to the cancellation of contracts worth millions of dollars.

Key Takeaways

  • Collective Impact lost contracts totaling $10.6 million due to conflicts of interest.
  • The nonprofit was a major recipient of funding under the Dream Keeper Initiative, aimed at supporting the Black community.
  • The scandal has raised questions about the management of city funds and the integrity of nonprofit operations in San Francisco.

Background of the Scandal

The controversy centers around Sheryl Davis, the former executive director of the San Francisco Human Rights Commission, who had a personal relationship with James Spingola, the executive director of Collective Impact. This relationship raised significant ethical concerns, particularly as Davis was involved in approving contracts worth up to $1.5 million for the nonprofit.

In December 2024, two city departments—the Human Rights Commission and the Office of Economic and Workforce Development—canceled their contracts with Collective Impact, citing “significant conflicts of interest.” The decision was made after it was revealed that the nonprofit had purchased copies of Davis’s self-published book and financially supported her podcast, raising questions about the integrity of the grant-making process.

Financial Implications

The cancellation of contracts has serious financial implications for Collective Impact, which has been a key player in the Dream Keeper Initiative. The initiative, launched by Mayor London Breed, aimed to redirect city funds to support economic and cultural development in Black communities. The following are the details of the canceled contracts:

Department Number of Contracts Total Value
Human Rights Commission 2 $2.5 million
Office of Economic and Workforce Development 3 $8.1 million
Total 5 $10.6 million

Collective Impact is currently awaiting $4.6 million in payments from the city, which will be withheld pending the outcome of ongoing investigations.

Reactions and Future Outlook

James Spingola has denied any wrongdoing, claiming that the actions taken against Collective Impact are unfair and an attack on the Black community. He emphasized that the nonprofit’s purchases of Davis’s book were intended to benefit local youth through a summer reading program.

Davis’s attorney stated that she had recused herself from the grant-making process and had no involvement in the awarding of contracts to Collective Impact since late 2022. However, the investigation revealed that she had received payments from the nonprofit, raising further ethical concerns.

Despite the cancellation of these contracts, Collective Impact has not been barred from future business with the city. The Human Rights Commission has expressed its commitment to ensuring fair treatment and equity for community-serving nonprofit organizations, indicating that the city will continue to work with Collective Impact in the future.

Conclusion

The scandal surrounding Collective Impact highlights the complexities and challenges of managing nonprofit organizations within the framework of public funding. As investigations continue, the implications for both the nonprofit and the city’s Dream Keeper Initiative remain to be seen, with calls for greater transparency and accountability in the use of taxpayer dollars.

Sources

  • S.F. agencies cancel contracts with nonprofit in wake of accusations, San Francisco Chronicle.
  • Scandal-ridden SF nonprofit linked to Dream Keeper loses funding, The San Francisco Standard.
Subscribe

Primary Sidebar

2026 AIM-AHEAD & NCATS Training Program – Cohort 3

Woodlands Arts Council’s Microgrant Program (Texas)

2025-2026 Community and Economic Development Grant (Oregon)

Submit Applications for Cornerstone Grant Program

The Harris Agency Impact Program 2026

Applications open for Ursa Major Fund (Alaska)

Hawaii Holomua Marine Initiative Pāpio Grants 2025

Strength in Service Funding Program (Hawaii)

Applications open for AIM-AHEAD All of Us Training Program 2025-2026

AIM-AHEAD Bridge2AI AI-READI Training Program 2025-2026

2026 AIM-AHEAD Bridge2AI for Clinical Care Training Program

Neighborhood Jobs Trust Technical Assistance Grant – Massachusetts

2026 Immigration Legal Access Grant (Massachusetts)

Massachusetts: Weaving Well-being Community Mental Health Grant

Strengthening Boston’s Diverse Neighborhoods (Massachusetts)

Community Enrichment Grant Program (Massachusetts)

Grants for Organizations serving Children and Young Adults in Texas

Capital Equipment Assistance Program Grant – Vermont

Solid Waste Infrastructure for Recycling (SWIFR) Grants for Tribes and Intertribal Consortia

Applications open for 2026 Hertz Fellowship

RENEW Wisconsin’s Solar for Good Initiative 2025

Submit Applications for Iowa Tourism Grant 2026

City of Gaithersburg Community Service Grant Program 2027 – Maryland

Community-Based Grants 2025 (New Mexico)

Applications open for NextGen Grantmakers Initiative (Missouri, Illinois)

Funds for NGOs
Funds for Companies
Funds for Media
Funds for Individuals
Sample Proposals

Contact us
Submit a Grant
Advertise, Guest Posting & Backlinks
Fight Fraud against NGOs
About us

Terms of Use
Third-Party Links & Ads
Disclaimers
Copyright Policy
General
Privacy Policy

About us

  • Sign up to be a Member
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Submit Your Grant
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service

©FUNDSFORNGOS LLC.   fundsforngos.org and fundsforngospremium.com domains and their subdomains are the property of FUNDSFORNGOS, LLC 140 Broadway 46th Floor, New York, NY 10005 United States. Unless otherwise specified, this website is not affiliated with any of the organizations mentioned above. The material provided here is solely for informational purposes only without any warranty. Visitors are advised to use it at their own discretion. Read the full disclaimer here. Unless otherwise specified, this website is not affiliated with any of the organizations mentioned above. The material provided here is solely for informational purposes only without any warranty. Visitors are advised to use it at their own discretion. Read the full disclaimer here.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}