A nonprofit organization, the Center for Voter Information (CVI), has responded defiantly to a cease-and-desist letter issued by Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown regarding its election mailers. The AG’s letter, sent after complaints from voters, claimed that the mailers were intimidating. However, CVI maintains that their intent is to encourage voter participation, not to intimidate.
Key Takeaways
- Maryland Attorney General issued a cease-and-desist letter to CVI over alleged intimidating mailers.
- CVI claims their mailers are designed to encourage voting, not intimidate.
- No further legal action will be taken against CVI after their response.
Background of the Controversy
The controversy began when residents in the Baltimore area received mailers from CVI that detailed their voting history and that of their neighbors. Many recipients found this information unsettling, prompting complaints to the Attorney General’s office.
In response to the cease-and-desist letter, CVI stated that the accusations were "false" and "irresponsible," asserting that their mailers simply aim to motivate individuals to vote. CVI’s president, Tom Lopach, emphasized that the organization has used this marketing technique for over two decades, claiming it effectively encourages voter turnout.
The Attorney General’s Response
Following CVI’s rebuttal, the Attorney General’s office released a statement indicating that they were satisfied with CVI’s assurances that they would not improperly contact voters. The AG’s office noted that CVI had committed to not publicizing information that identifies specific voters or their voting histories, particularly regarding the upcoming 2024 presidential election.
Despite the AG’s cease-and-desist letter, some mailers had already been sent out and may still be arriving in mailboxes. The AG’s office confirmed that they had received multiple complaints about the mailers, which contributed to the decision to issue the letter.
Public Reaction
The mailers have sparked a significant public debate. Some community members, like Dorothy O’Bannon, president of the Langston Hughes Community Association, expressed concern that the mailers could be perceived as intimidation tactics. O’Bannon stated, "I’m disturbed by this. This is an intimidation tactic."
In contrast, Lopach defended the mailers, arguing that they are a legitimate method to promote civic engagement. He stated, "Folks like to behave in line with societal norms, and if we can demonstrate that neighbors are voting regularly, why don’t you want to be like your neighbors?"
Election Officials Weigh In
Maryland State Elections Administrator Jared DeMarinis also commented on the situation, urging voters not to feel intimidated by the mailers. He emphasized the importance of civic duty and encouraged all eligible voters to participate in elections. DeMarinis stated, "Come out and vote. Don’t be intimidated by anything. Make your voice heard, and that’s the key to everything."
Conclusion
The situation surrounding the CVI mailers highlights the delicate balance between encouraging voter participation and ensuring that such efforts do not cross the line into intimidation. As the 2024 presidential election approaches, the focus will remain on how organizations like CVI navigate these challenges while promoting voter turnout effectively.
