• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

fundsforNGOs - United States

Grants and Resources for Sustainability

  • Subscribe for Free
  • Premium Support
  • Premium Sign up
  • Premium Sign in
  • Latest News
  • Funds for US Organizations
    • Nonprofits
    • Community Foundations
    • Faith-based Organizations
    • Tribal Organizations
    • Institutions
      • Hospitals
      • Schools
      • Universities
  • Funds for US Businesses
    • Startups
    • Small Businesses
    • Large Business
  • Funds for US Individuals
    • Artists
    • College Students
    • School Students
    • Entrepreneurs
    • Persons with Disabilities
    • Researchers
    • Veterans
    • House Owners
    • Tenants
  • US Thematic Areas
    • US States
  • Contact
    • About us
    • Submit Your Grant
You are here: Home / Grant Duration>4 Years / USDA/NIFA: Integrated Research, Education, and Extension Competitive Grants Program

USDA/NIFA: Integrated Research, Education, and Extension Competitive Grants Program

Dated: December 17, 2024

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), through the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), invites applications for the 2025 Integrated Research, Education, and Extension Competitive Grants Program.

Donor Name: National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)

State: All States

County: All Counties

Type of Grant: Grant

Deadline: 03/06/2025

Size of the Grant: $500,000 to $1 million

Grant Duration: 4 Years

Details:

Purpose 

The overall goal of the ORG program is to support the development and implementation of research, extension, and higher education programs to improve the competitiveness of U.S. organic livestock and crop producers, as well as those who are adopting organic practices.

  • Subject to the availability of appropriations to carry out this program, the Secretary may award grants to colleges and universities [as defined by section 1404 of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 as amended, on a competitive basis for projects that address priorities in United States agriculture and involve integrated research, education, and extension activities, as determined by the Secretary in consultation with the National Agricultural Research, Extension, Education, and Economics Advisory Board (NAREEEAB).
  • One of the primary goals and objectives of the ORG program is to address practices and systems particularly associated with organic crops, organic animal production, and organic systems that integrate crop and animal production.
  • ORG strongly encourages applicants to develop partnerships that include collaboration with small- or mid-sized, accredited colleges and universities; 1890 Land-Grant Institutions, 1994 Land-Grant Institutions, Hispanic-serving institutions, and/or other institutions that serve high-risk, under-served, or hard-to-reach audiences as well as Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) that are engaged in organic agriculture research, education, and outreach.
  • International partnerships, linkages, and exchanges that contribute to solving or solve critical U.S. organic agriculture issues, priorities, or problems in the United States are also welcome.
  • Applications are expected to contain descriptions of stakeholder involvement in the research process from problem identification, planning, implementation, transfer of knowledge and technology, and evaluation. Applicants are strongly encouraged to assemble project teams that include those with expertise in research, education, extension, and evaluation, and to utilize a systems approach. Projects should plan to deliver applied production information to producers, students, or their information providers, such as extension agents/educators, agricultural consultants and other service providers, or college teaching faculty.
  • Organic agricultural systems and practices provide many ecosystem services, and natural resources stewardship is a key principle in organic farming. For example, the use of cover crops, crop rotations, and erosion control measures; proper manure management practices; and humane livestock operation guidelines are cross-compliant with many Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) practice standards. How specific practices and combinations of practices interact in organic systems—including their contributions to conservation outcomes and climate change mitigation and adaptation potential—is neither well documented nor understood, especially in the case of long-term soil management under organic production conditions.
  • The most meaningful metrics or models to quantify ecosystem services in organic systems are also not clear. A better understanding is needed, and documentation of these outcomes will allow for the adjustment of organic practices to optimize ecosystem services and to quantify and document those services in the areas of conservation practices, pollinator health, and climate adaptation, including the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. This information will help farmers better assess the financial benefits and costs of their practices and improve their ability to qualify effects for current and possible future incentives in conservation program payments and climate change markets, and sustainability labeling premiums. This process will also help justify consumer expectations that organically grown and certified food, feed, fiber, or other value-added organic products are produced using the most environmentally sound and sustainable production practices possible.
  • To be successful, organic agriculture also needs to contribute toward essential ecosystem processes and components, such as biodiversity. This requires better understanding and assessment of the contribution of organic agricultural systems to maintain biodiversity. However, for organic agriculture to provide these ecosystem benefits, producers need economically viable crop and livestock management tools. The National Organic Program (NOP) maintains a list of management tools for certified organic producers. Recommendation for removal of certain tools from the NOP also creates the need for research-based alternatives.
  • The NOP has specifically requested research directed to finding replacements for listed prohibited substances that are critical for many segments of the industry – for producers already certified for organic production to those in transition or considering transition.
  • The National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) maintains a list of research priorities that is updated annually.
  • Research findings will not have their intended impact on the organic agriculture industry unless they reach and are adopted by producers. Effective extension or other outreach efforts are required. Because few extension tools and other information resources are available to organic farmers and ranchers, producers and their advisors have cited the need for these to help guide transitioning during this critical period.
  • Projects that use traditional ecological knowledge are appropriate for this program, provided it fits to the program’s priorities and goals as described in this RFA.

Priorities

  • Priority 1: Document and understand the effects of organic practices on soil health and fertility; greenhouse gas mitigation; enhanced biodiversity; and understanding of weeds, pests and diseases dynamics for better management to help systems adapt to climate change, build resilience of the organic farming system, protect water and other resources, and provide other ecosystem services. These practices include but are not limited to crop rotation; livestock feeding and management; livestock-crop system integration; organic manure, mulch, and/or compost additions; cover crops; and reduced or conservation tillage.
  • Priority 2: Develop improved technologies, methods, models, and metrics to document, describe, and optimize the ecosystem services and the climate change adaptation and mitigation ability of organic crop, livestock, and integrated crop-livestock production systems.
  • Priority 3: Develop cultural practices and other allowable alternatives to substances recommended for removal from NOP’s National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances. This may include effective substitutes or new technologies, cultural practices, cultivars, or breeds that render the NOP-cited substance in question less limiting to production under organic standards. Studies of alternatives should include evaluation of efficacy based on resulting productivity, profitability, climate change adaptation, and natural resources stewardship effects. We encourage a sustainable whole-systems approach but will also consider proposals that are narrower in scope.
  • Priority 4: Overcome barriers to organic transition. Projects under this priority should address major barriers that limit the transition to organic agriculture in a specific region, crop, or animal production system and develop practical information and tools for producer use. These can include, but are not limited to, production challenges during the transition period, local and regional infrastructure constraints, marketplace challenges, disruptive conditions like the COVID-19 pandemic, and administrative or policy barriers. Any constraint must be acknowledged by growers and other stakeholders. Proposals to improve organic animal or crop production management strategies and production systems should be submitted to the Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative (OREI). Lobbying and advocacy activities are not allowed.

Funding Information

  • Estimated Total Program Funding: $7,500,000
  • Award Ceiling: $1,000,000
  • Award Floor: $5,000

Grant Period

ORG anticipates funding Integrated Research, Education, and Extension projects as Standard grants with a project period of 2 to 4 years.

Eligibility Criteria 

Applications may only be submitted by colleges and universities, as defined in 7 U.S.C. 3103, 1994 Institutions, and Hispanic-serving agricultural colleges and universities.

For more information, visit Grants.gov.

Subscribe

Primary Sidebar

Beautification in Action Grants (Arizona)

AWS Foundation Accessible Communities Fund – Indiana

PalmettoPride Tree Grant – South Carolina

KREMC Operation Round-Up Grant (Indiana)

Infant & Toddler Care Grants: Operating Support – Indiana

Call for Applications for Facilities Upgrades Grants – Indiana

Martha Wong and Mark Smith–Gloria Meraz Scholarships (Texas)

Submit Applications for Kosciusko Community Foundation Grant (Indiana)

2026 Environmental Education Grants Program – Pennsylvania

Submit Applications for Nagel Foundation Grant (Idaho)

Applications open for 101 Women Sandpoint Grant 2025 – Idaho

Applications open for Kosciusko Endowment Youth Services Grant (Indiana)

2026 Operating Support Grant (Minnesota)

2025 Artist Equity Grant Program (Minnesota)

RCF Innovative Teaching Grant 2025-2026 (New York)

2025 Climate Equity Fund (Colorado)

2025 Municipal Park Improvement Initiative (New York)

Kansas: Technical Assistance and Water Projects Fund Grants 2026

give256 Grant 2025 (Alabama)

Vector Wealth Strategies Funds 2025 – Alabama

Applications open for MartinConnects Fund 2025

Lyon County Riverboat Foundation Grant in Iowa

Every Tree Counts Mini-Grant Program (Maryland)

Iowa: Muscatine Housing Cluster Grants

Request for Applications for Uplift Fund Microgrant 2025

Funds for NGOs
Funds for Companies
Funds for Media
Funds for Individuals
Sample Proposals

Contact us
Submit a Grant
Advertise, Guest Posting & Backlinks
Fight Fraud against NGOs
About us

Terms of Use
Third-Party Links & Ads
Disclaimers
Copyright Policy
General
Privacy Policy

About us

  • Sign up to be a Member
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Submit Your Grant
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service

©FUNDSFORNGOS LLC.   fundsforngos.org and fundsforngospremium.com domains and their subdomains are the property of FUNDSFORNGOS, LLC 140 Broadway 46th Floor, New York, NY 10005 United States. Unless otherwise specified, this website is not affiliated with any of the organizations mentioned above. The material provided here is solely for informational purposes only without any warranty. Visitors are advised to use it at their own discretion. Read the full disclaimer here. Unless otherwise specified, this website is not affiliated with any of the organizations mentioned above. The material provided here is solely for informational purposes only without any warranty. Visitors are advised to use it at their own discretion. Read the full disclaimer here.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}