• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

fundsforNGOs - United States

Grants and Resources for Sustainability

  • Subscribe for Free
  • Premium Support
  • Premium Sign up
  • Premium Sign in
  • Latest News
  • Funds for US Organizations
    • Nonprofits
    • Community Foundations
    • Faith-based Organizations
    • Tribal Organizations
    • Institutions
      • Hospitals
      • Schools
      • Universities
  • Funds for US Businesses
    • Startups
    • Small Businesses
    • Large Business
  • Funds for US Individuals
    • Artists
    • College Students
    • School Students
    • Entrepreneurs
    • Persons with Disabilities
    • Researchers
    • Veterans
    • House Owners
    • Tenants
  • US Thematic Areas
    • US States
  • Contact
    • About us
    • Submit Your Grant
You are here: Home / News / Asda Workers Move Closer to Historic Equality Payouts

Asda Workers Move Closer to Historic Equality Payouts

Dated: February 7, 2025

Tens of thousands of Asda store workers are on the brink of significant payouts following a landmark ruling in an equality case. The employment tribunal has determined that many shop roles, predominantly held by women, are of equal value to higher-paid positions in Asda’s warehouses, which are mainly occupied by men. This decision could lead to collective back pay amounting to £1.2 billion for the affected workers.

Key Takeaways

  • Historic Ruling: The tribunal found in favor of 12 out of 14 lead claimants, establishing that their roles are of equal value to those in warehouses.
  • Potential Payouts: The ruling could result in back pay worth up to £1.2 billion for Asda’s shop workers.
  • Ongoing Legal Battle: Asda plans to appeal the ruling regarding two specific job roles that were not found to be of equal value.

Background of the Case

The case has been ongoing for over a decade, with the claimants arguing that the pay disparity between shop workers and warehouse staff is discriminatory. The tribunal’s recent judgment covers the period from August 2008 to June 2014, marking a significant milestone in the fight for pay equality within the retail sector.

Details of the Ruling

The tribunal’s decision has confirmed that:

  1. Equal Value Established: The majority of shop roles are deemed to have equal value to warehouse positions.
  2. Claims Progress: This ruling marks the second of three stages won by the claimants in their equal pay claim.
  3. Exclusions: Two roles—personal shoppers and shop floor assistants for edible grocery—were excluded from the ruling, affecting about 20% of the claims.

Implications for Asda Workers

The implications of this ruling are profound for Asda’s workforce:

  • Financial Impact: If the ruling stands, it could lead to substantial financial compensation for thousands of workers.
  • Union Support: Unions have expressed optimism that this ruling will encourage a swift resolution to the ongoing claims.
  • Legal Representation: Law firm Leigh Day, representing over 60,000 workers, is considering an appeal regarding the excluded roles, indicating that the legal battle may continue.

Asda’s Response

In response to the tribunal’s ruling, Asda has stated:

  • Rejection of Discrimination Claims: The company firmly denies any claims of discriminatory pay practices.
  • Next Steps: Asda plans to argue that market conditions justify the pay differences between retail and distribution roles, which they claim operate under distinct pay structures.

Conclusion

The recent tribunal ruling represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle for pay equality among Asda workers. As the case progresses, the outcome could set a precedent for similar claims across the retail sector, highlighting the importance of equal pay for equal work. The next phase of litigation will be crucial in determining the final resolution for the affected workers, as they continue to seek recognition and fair compensation for their contributions to the company.

Sources

  • Thousands of Asda shop workers move closer to payouts in historic equality case, MSN.
Subscribe

Primary Sidebar

Wildfire Smoke Preparedness in Community Buildings Grant

Call for Applications for Community Grants

Women’s Giving of Frederick County Grants – Maryland

Guy I. Bromley Trust Fund (Missouri and Kansas)

City of Wichita Falls Arts and Culture Grants (Texas)

Specialty Crop Block Grant Program 2026 (Utah)

Submit Applications for Park and Play Grants 2026 (Maryland)

Ann Katherine Spear Humanitarian Foundation Grant (Georgia)

Dennis Schuman Charitable Foundation Fund

Louis H. Shaman Charitable Foundation Program (Maryland)

Benjamin H. Smyser Foundation Fund (Indiana)

The Louis K. Snipes Foundation for Animal Care Grant (Texas)

K.D. and M.L. Steadley Memorial Trust Grant (Missouri)

Historic Preservation Grant Program 2026 (Iowa)

Fund for Carbon County 2026 – Pennsylvania

Submit Applications for Rural Community Grant Fund (North Dakota)

Submit Applications for Benefit Fund (Virginia)

2026 Community Finance Initiative Fund

Belmont County Enrichment Fund 2026 (Ohio)

Anne Arundel County Community Support Grant 2027 (Maryland)

2026 Community Impact Grants Program (Ohio)

Welcoming Communities Grants Program – Pennsylvania

Call for Applications for George William Groh Trust Grant

Diamonds in the Rough Grants Program 2026 (Oregon)

2026 Historic Cemeteries Grants Program – Oregon

Funds for NGOs
Funds for Companies
Funds for Media
Funds for Individuals
Sample Proposals

Contact us
Submit a Grant
Advertise, Guest Posting & Backlinks
Fight Fraud against NGOs
About us

Terms of Use
Third-Party Links & Ads
Disclaimers
Copyright Policy
General
Privacy Policy

About us

  • Sign up to be a Member
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Submit Your Grant
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service

©FUNDSFORNGOS LLC.   fundsforngos.org, fundsforngos.ai, and fundsforngospremium.com domains and their subdomains are the property of FUNDSFORNGOS, LLC 1018, 1060 Broadway, Albany, New York, NY 12204, United States.   Unless otherwise specified, this website is not affiliated with the abovementioned organizations. The material provided here is solely for informational purposes and without any warranty. Visitors are advised to use it at their discretion. Read the full disclaimer here. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}