• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

fundsforNGOs - United States

Grants and Resources for Sustainability

  • Subscribe for Free
  • Premium Support
  • Premium Sign up
  • Premium Sign in
  • Latest News
  • Funds for US Organizations
    • Nonprofits
    • Community Foundations
    • Faith-based Organizations
    • Tribal Organizations
    • Institutions
      • Hospitals
      • Schools
      • Universities
  • Funds for US Businesses
    • Startups
    • Small Businesses
    • Large Business
  • Funds for US Individuals
    • Artists
    • College Students
    • School Students
    • Entrepreneurs
    • Persons with Disabilities
    • Researchers
    • Veterans
    • House Owners
    • Tenants
  • US Thematic Areas
    • US States
  • Contact
    • About us
    • Submit Your Grant
You are here: Home / News / ‘They Were Wrong’: Oklahoma Nonprofit Study Reveals Prosecutorial Misconduct

‘They Were Wrong’: Oklahoma Nonprofit Study Reveals Prosecutorial Misconduct

Dated: October 17, 2024

An Oklahoma nonprofit has released a significant study highlighting prosecutorial misconduct in the state, calling for urgent criminal justice reform. The Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law and Justice’s findings suggest that numerous wrongful convictions have occurred due to prosecutors withholding evidence, raising serious concerns about the integrity of the justice system.

Key Takeaways

  • The study, titled "The Truth Will Always Come Out: Prosecutorial Misconduct, Brady Violations, and Lack of Justice in Oklahoma," reveals alarming statistics regarding wrongful convictions.
  • An estimated 30% of exonerated cases in Oklahoma may involve prosecutorial misconduct.
  • Recommendations for reform include open file discovery and the establishment of a conviction integrity unit.

Overview Of The Study

The Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law and Justice has been investigating prosecutorial misconduct since last summer. Their report, released recently, focuses on the troubling practice of withholding evidence in criminal trials, which has led to wrongful convictions.

Executive Director Colleen McCarty emphasized the need for a justice system that earns public trust, stating, "We deserve a justice system that’s worthy of the public trust."

Findings On Wrongful Convictions

The study examined over 500 cases and found that:

  • Approximately 30% of exonerated cases in Oklahoma, particularly in Tulsa and Pontotoc counties, may involve prosecutorial misconduct.
  • Many individuals remain imprisoned despite scientific evidence proving their innocence.

McCarty noted, "They still go 100% to the mat trying to keep these people in prison, trying to keep these people even when there’s evidence, scientific evidence, that they were wrong."

Recommendations For Reform

The report outlines several key recommendations aimed at reforming the prosecutorial system in Oklahoma:

  1. Open File Discovery: This would require prosecutors to automatically share all evidence with the defense, promoting transparency.
  2. Change in Appeal Rules: The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals should allow individuals to claim a Brady violation during appeals.
  3. Conviction Integrity Unit: Establishing a separate unit to review cases with potential wrongful convictions, distinct from the original prosecuting team.
  4. Prosecutorial Oversight: Creating an independent board to investigate prosecutorial misconduct, with the authority to recommend removal or retirement for those who violate ethical standards.

Next Steps

McCarty plans to present the findings and recommendations at an upcoming "Corrections and Sentencing" interim study at the State Capitol on October 29. The hope is that this report will spark necessary discussions and lead to meaningful changes in Oklahoma’s criminal justice system.

The Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law and Justice’s study serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of accountability and transparency in the prosecutorial process, aiming to restore faith in a system that many believe has failed them.

Sources

  • ‘They were wrong’: Oklahoma nonprofit study reveals prosecutorial misconduct, KOKH.
Subscribe

Primary Sidebar

Call for Applications for Community Grants

Women’s Giving of Frederick County Grants – Maryland

Guy I. Bromley Trust Fund (Missouri and Kansas)

City of Wichita Falls Arts and Culture Grants (Texas)

Specialty Crop Block Grant Program 2026 (Utah)

Submit Applications for Park and Play Grants 2026 (Maryland)

Ann Katherine Spear Humanitarian Foundation Grant (Georgia)

Dennis Schuman Charitable Foundation Fund

Louis H. Shaman Charitable Foundation Program (Maryland)

Benjamin H. Smyser Foundation Fund (Indiana)

The Louis K. Snipes Foundation for Animal Care Grant (Texas)

K.D. and M.L. Steadley Memorial Trust Grant (Missouri)

Historic Preservation Grant Program 2026 (Iowa)

Fund for Carbon County 2026 – Pennsylvania

Submit Applications for Rural Community Grant Fund (North Dakota)

Submit Applications for Benefit Fund (Virginia)

2026 Community Finance Initiative Fund

Belmont County Enrichment Fund 2026 (Ohio)

Anne Arundel County Community Support Grant 2027 (Maryland)

2026 Community Impact Grants Program (Ohio)

Welcoming Communities Grants Program – Pennsylvania

Call for Applications for George William Groh Trust Grant

Diamonds in the Rough Grants Program 2026 (Oregon)

2026 Historic Cemeteries Grants Program – Oregon

Preserving Oregon Grant Program 2026

Funds for NGOs
Funds for Companies
Funds for Media
Funds for Individuals
Sample Proposals

Contact us
Submit a Grant
Advertise, Guest Posting & Backlinks
Fight Fraud against NGOs
About us

Terms of Use
Third-Party Links & Ads
Disclaimers
Copyright Policy
General
Privacy Policy

About us

  • Sign up to be a Member
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Submit Your Grant
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service

©FUNDSFORNGOS LLC.   fundsforngos.org, fundsforngos.ai, and fundsforngospremium.com domains and their subdomains are the property of FUNDSFORNGOS, LLC 1018, 1060 Broadway, Albany, New York, NY 12204, United States.   Unless otherwise specified, this website is not affiliated with the abovementioned organizations. The material provided here is solely for informational purposes and without any warranty. Visitors are advised to use it at their discretion. Read the full disclaimer here. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}